Publication Ethic

Author Ethics

  1. Reporting Standards. Authors are required to present the research process, data analysis, and findings honestly, accurately, and comprehensively. Research data must be properly documented and stored securely to allow verification when necessary.
  2. Originality and Plagiarism. Authors must ensure that submitted manuscripts are original works and have not been plagiarized, either in whole or in part. Any use of ideas, data, or words from other sources must be appropriately cited and referenced in accordance with academic standards.
  3. Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication. Authors must confirm that the manuscript has not been previously published and is not under consideration by another journal. Any form of duplicate submission is unethical and will result in rejection by the editorial board.
  4. Authorship and Contribution. Authorship should reflect significant contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the research. All contributors who meet the authorship criteria must be listed, and all listed authors must approve the final version of the manuscript.
  5. Errors in Published Works. Authors are obligated to promptly notify the editor if they discover significant errors or inaccuracies in the submitted or published manuscript and cooperate in correcting or retracting the article if required.
  6. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest. Authors must disclose any financial, institutional, or personal relationships that may influence the research or interpretation of findings. Transparency is essential to maintain the integrity of the publication process.

Editor Ethics

  1. Publication Decisions. Editors are responsible for deciding which manuscripts are accepted for publication based on scholarly merit, originality, relevance to the journal’s scope, and reviewer recommendations, while ensuring a fair and transparent review process.
  2. Editorial Information and Guidelines. Editors must ensure that author guidelines, publication policies, and ethical standards are clearly communicated and easily accessible through both print and online platforms.
  3. Peer Review Process. Editors are responsible for assigning manuscripts to appropriate reviewers and clearly explaining the review procedures, criteria, and timelines.
  4. Fairness and Objectivity. Editorial decisions must be made without discrimination based on gender, race, religion, nationality, or institutional affiliation.
  5. Confidentiality. Editors must safeguard the confidentiality of all submitted manuscripts and author information.
  6. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest. Editors must avoid conflicts of interest and recuse themselves from handling manuscripts where such conflicts exist.

Reviewer Ethics

  1. Objectivity and Independence. Reviewers must conduct evaluations objectively, fairly, and professionally, without personal bias or consideration of the author’s identity or background.
  2. Source Acknowledgement. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the author and notify the editor of any substantial similarity or overlap with other publications.
  3. Timeliness of Review. Reviewers are expected to complete reviews within the specified timeframe (maximum two weeks). If unable to do so, they must promptly inform the editor.
  4. Confidentiality and Conflict of Interest. Manuscripts under review must be treated as confidential documents. Reviewers must declare any potential conflicts of interest and decline review when necessary.

Journal Manager Ethics

  1. Policy and Decision Transparency. Journal managers are responsible for clearly communicating the journal’s mission, scope, and publication policies, ensuring that editorial decisions are made without personal or institutional bias.
  2. Editorial Independence and Privacy. Journal managers must respect editorial independence and protect the confidentiality of authors, editors, and reviewers.
  3. Intellectual Property and Promotion. Journal managers are obligated to protect intellectual property rights, manage financial and third-party support transparently, and promote published works ethically for the benefit of the academic community.
  4. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest. Journal managers must avoid conflicts of interest and adhere to ethical publishing standards to ensure a trustworthy and accountable publication process.